From Control to Outcomes: A Gartner Leader and our Vision for Data Governance in the AI Era

We're honored to be recognized as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Data and Analytics Governance. Following our Leader recognition in last month's Magic Quadrant for Metadata Management (and five-time placement as a Leader from Gartner over the years), in our opinion, this recognition validates both our platform capabilities and something deeper: a new vision for what governance must become in the AI era. 

In this blog, we introduce outcome-based governance, which is our vision for the future of data governance, and explain why it is essential for data leaders, governance teams, and business executives seeking to deliver measurable business value from data and AI. 

The limits of process-driven data governance 

Traditional governance breaks down because it operates separately from the business outcomes it is meant to support. 

In many organizations, governance becomes an academic exercise: policies are written, standards are approved, and compliance is tracked—often within governance silos and disconnected from real business and AI use cases. Success is measured by documentation and process completion, not by whether the organization is measurably safer, faster, or more effective. 

As a result, governance is rarely experienced as a business partner. At best, it is treated as a checkbox to satisfy with minimal effort. At worst, it is invisible—policies live in documents, standards surface only during audits, and risk remains abstract until something goes wrong.

Even in large, mature enterprises, governance intent degrades as it moves from policy to execution. Business and legal teams articulate requirements. Governance teams interpret them. Data and platform teams translate them into technical controls. Each handoff introduces delay, interpretation, and inconsistency. What begins as clear intent often ends as fragmented, manual execution.

For many teams, especially those without deep expertise or large budgets, this translation chain becomes a dead end. Governance stalls at documentation because there is no scalable way to operationalize it. Manual classification, spreadsheet tracking, and periodic reviews consume time and resources while delivering limited visibility into real risk.

In fast-moving, AI-driven environments, this model cannot keep pace. Governance exists in theory, but not in practice. It is expensive to maintain, difficult to scale, and disconnected from the outcomes the business actually cares about.

Outcome-based governance: Shifting to an agentic operating system 

Outcome-based governance represents a fundamental shift in how governance works.

In this model, policies express business intent and define desired outcomes, and the system is responsible for realizing those outcomes continuously through agents and automation. Governance is no longer something teams manually interpret, coordinate, and enforce; it is something the platform executes. 

Policies define what must be true. Standards define the requirements to achieve those outcomes. Agents interpret those requirements and take action—enriching metadata, validating quality, escalating risk, or guiding human review when needed. The result is governance that operates as a living system, not a static process. 

This operating system fundamentally changes who can succeed with governance. Smaller teams no longer need deep, specialized expertise or large manual effort to translate intent into action. Instead, they manage and direct the system—setting outcomes, monitoring progress, and intervening only where judgment is required. Governance becomes scalable, repeatable, and measurable by design. 

Most importantly, outcome-based governance makes business value explicit. Compliance is provable, not assumed. Trust is measurable, not anecdotal. Impact is visible in faster AI deployment, reduced risk, and higher confidence in data-driven decisions. Governance stops being overhead and becomes a capability the business relies on to move faster with confidence.

Automation as the engine of governance outcomes 

Outcome-based governance becomes real when intent is translated into action at scale.

At Alation, agents interpret policies and standards and take the actions required to enforce, remediate, or escalate issues across the data landscape. Where nuance, accountability, or judgment is required, agents keep humans in the loop—routing exceptions for review, incorporating feedback, and amplifying human expertise without turning people into bottlenecks. Just as importantly, agents operate with transparency: their decisions are auditable, traceable, and evaluable, ensuring governance actions can be understood, validated, and trusted. 

Out-of-the-box agents allow organizations to begin realizing outcome-based governance immediately, while Agent Studio enables teams to design custom agents tailored to their specific policies, industries, and use cases. Together, these capabilities form the execution layer of the governance operating system—embedding governance directly into how data and AI are used while meeting enterprise expectations for safety and control. 

• Our Data Products Builder Agent accelerates the creation of trusted, reusable data products that power analytics and production-grade AI.

• CDE Manager identifies critical data elements, connects them to the right assets, continuously measures quality, and surfaces risk tied to key regulatory and business processes.

• Our Data Quality Agent automates validation, anomaly detection, and remediation workflows.

• Agent Studio enables teams to design and deploy custom agents that reflect their unique governance intent.

• Our Curation Agents (coming soon) automatically add and maintain rich business context at scale, including classifications, descriptions, and metadata tailored to each organization’s needs.

As a result, governance no longer depends on stewards manually classifying assets or tracking compliance in spreadsheets. Agents handle repetitive work continuously and transparently, allowing people to focus on judgment and decision-making while governance scales safely and predictably.

Governance that activates only when needed 

Outcome-based governance also changes when governance happens. Rather than applying uniform controls across every asset as a precaution, actions are triggered when required to achieve or maintain a predefined outcome. 

This reduces friction for data producers and consumers while focusing governance efforts to where they deliver real business value. 

Measuring what matters 

Perhaps most importantly, outcome-based governance makes progress measurable and visible. Success isn't tracked through process compliance; it's measured through business outcomes. 

Organizations can see the trust and usability of their data assets improving. They can measure speed to insight or AI deployment. They can demonstrate reduced risk without reduced access. When governance value is clear and connected to business goals, adoption follows naturally. 

A new definition of governance for the AI era

In our opinion, our continued recognition as a Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrants reflects not just product capability, but a new and differentiated philosophy about the future of data governance as we know it. 

In an AI-driven world, governance must operate as a dynamic system that guides, adapts, and scales with the business. Organizations do not need more processes or more tools. They need governance that works as part of how data and AI are used every day.

That is the vision driving everything we build at Alation.

Curious to read the report? Get your free copy here.

Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Data and Analytics Governance, 2024. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.