Cloud-Native vs. Cloud-Based: 9 Key Differences To Remember

Published on October 21, 2025

Cloud Native vs. Cloud Enabled: What's the Difference

In 2026, the difference between cloud-native and cloud-based isn’t just technical — it’s strategic. As organizations modernize software development, adopt AI, and migrate legacy applications to the cloud, their infrastructure choices directly shape agility, scalability, and innovation.

The public cloud continues to dominate enterprise IT spending. In fact, worldwide end-user spending on public cloud services is expected to reach $723.4 billion in 2025, a 21.5% year-over-year increase (Gartner). This surge underscores how essential cloud services, serverless computing, and cloud-native technologies have become for digital transformation.

This guide breaks down the nine key differences between cloud-native and cloud-based architectures, explains related “cloud” terms, and explores why cloud-native application development is increasingly the standard for modern enterprises — particularly those focused on data governance, AI readiness, and long-term scalability.

Banner promoting a webinar featuring fintech customer Fiserv, sharing how they use Alation to modernize their data ecosystem

What is cloud-native?

A cloud-native application is designed, built, and deployed entirely within the cloud — not merely migrated there. These applications are born in the cloud, leveraging the on-demand provisioning of cloud resources, and built using open-source frameworks and microservices architecture that ensure speed, scalability, and agility.

Cloud-native systems use containerization (such as Docker and Kubernetes), serverless computing, and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Together, these enable organizations to deploy new features rapidly, recover automatically from failures, and maintain high availability across different cloud environments.

How is this landscape shifting in 2026? For starters, 85% of organizations now use Kubernetes in production, reflecting widespread adoption of containerization and microservices architecture (CNCF Annual Survey 2024). These advances allow teams to deploy and update cloud-native applications with speed and precision.

Characteristics of cloud-native systems

Before diving deeper into the key differences, it’s helpful to understand what defines a true cloud-native environment.

Cloud-native systems are:

  • Built for the cloud from the ground up, not refactored legacy software

  • Modular and decoupled, following a microservices architecture

  • Containerized for portability across different cloud providers such as AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud

  • Automated, with CI/CD pipelines that enable seamless rollouts and rollbacks

  • Resilient, offering built-in high availability through distributed design

  • Scalable, with automatic on-demand provisioning and load balancing

  • Secure, integrating DevSecOps practices directly into application development

  • Cloud-agnostic, capable of running on multiple platforms through open standards

Unlike traditional on-premises infrastructure, cloud-native systems aren’t constrained by static servers or manual upgrades. Instead, they thrive in dynamic, elastic ecosystems managed by a service provider that automates scaling and updates.

Key considerations for cloud-optimized systems include

What is cloud-based?

A cloud-based application runs in the cloud but wasn’t necessarily designed for it. Typically, these are legacy applications originally built for on-premises infrastructure and later migrated — or “lifted and shifted” — to the cloud.

While these systems benefit from cloud hosting, such as accessibility and reduced maintenance, they often retain monolithic architecture and rigid dependencies that limit agility. Nevertheless, cloud-based deployments remain essential for many organizations, balancing modernization with risk management.

Why organizations choose hybrid or cloud-based approaches

Enterprises might choose a hybrid or cloud-based approach for several valid reasons:

  • Regulatory and compliance obligations require sensitive data to remain within specific jurisdictions or controlled facilities.

  • Legacy investments make it difficult or cost-prohibitive to refactor entire systems into cloud-native technologies.

  • Gradual modernization strategies favor hybrid models that mix cloud services with existing on-premises infrastructure.

  • Operational resilience — retaining some workloads locally ensures control during outages or while transitioning service providers.

  • Cost predictability — fixed-capacity virtual machines and reserved instances suit steady workloads.

Ultimately, hybrid architectures help organizations modernize responsibly, especially those in highly regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, and government.

Characteristics of cloud-based systems

Cloud-based systems exhibit the following attributes:

  • Originally built for on-premises infrastructure, then migrated to cloud hosting

  • Dependence on virtual machines rather than containerization

  • Limited scalability — often achieved through vertical scaling

  • Manual or semi-automated upgrades and deployments

  • Reliance on traditional, stateful databases

  • Centralized management and single points of failure

  • Slower adaptation to new features or changing workloads

  • Security focused on the network perimeter rather than continuous enforcement

These systems still harness many benefits of cloud computing — flexibility, lower upfront costs, and simplified maintenance — but cannot match the elasticity or resilience of fully cloud-native environments.

What is the difference between cloud-based and cloud-native?

The table below summarizes how these two models diverge across nine critical dimensions:

Category

Cloud-native

Cloud-based

Design philosophy

Built for cloud from the ground up using microservices

Legacy apps migrated to the cloud environment

Architecture

Modular, API-driven, containerized

Monolithic or VM-based, less modular

Deployment speed

Automated CI/CD pipelines, rapid releases

Manual or scheduled deployments

Resilience

Self-healing, distributed workloads

Dependent on centralized servers

Scalability

Horizontal scaling and load balancing

Vertical scaling, limited automation

Security

DevSecOps and runtime security built-in

Perimeter security and manual patching

Storage

Distributed cloud databases, object storage

Traditional RDBMS hosted in cloud

Performance

Automated tuning, dynamic resource allocation

Manual performance optimization

Disaster recovery

Automated replication and failover

Manual or backup-based recovery

Let’s explore these differences in more depth.

1. Design and architecture

Cloud-native applications are engineered to run efficiently across different cloud environments. Built using microservices architecture, they separate functionality into independent services that communicate via APIs. This modularity enables frequent updates, on-demand provisioning, and faster innovation cycles.

By contrast, cloud-based solutions are typically adapted legacy applications that rely on tightly coupled systems. Modifying one component can require broad code changes and coordinated upgrades, slowing time to market and innovation.

2. Deployment and implementation

Cloud-native technologies leverage CI/CD automation, enabling seamless, low-risk rollouts. Developers can push new features to production frequently without manual intervention.

According to the CNCF Annual Survey 2024, 38% of enterprises say 80–100% of their releases are automated, demonstrating how modern automation drives rapid delivery and stability.

In contrast, cloud-based systems often rely on manual deployments or scheduled updates. Downtime windows remain common, especially for systems rooted in traditional software development practices.

3. Scalability and performance

Cloud-native solutions scale horizontally — new instances automatically spin up across cloud resources using load balancing to meet demand peaks. This approach delivers near-limitless elasticity while optimizing costs.

Cloud-based applications typically scale vertically — by increasing CPU or memory within a single instance — which can introduce performance bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

Because cloud-native systems are decoupled and stateless, they excel in high availability scenarios and maintain steady performance during unpredictable workloads.

4. Resilience and reliability

Cloud-native technologies are inherently resilient. They distribute workloads across containers, nodes, and even different cloud providers. If one instance fails, orchestration tools like Kubernetes automatically replace it.

In contrast, cloud-based systems depend on centralized servers and require manual recovery. Failures can cascade across dependent services, compromising uptime.

This distributed model is why 70% of enterprises are expected to adopt cloud-native networking by 2027 to support AI, edge, and multicloud workloads (Comcast Business).

5. Cost efficiency

Cloud-native systems rely on on-demand provisioning, automatically adjusting resources as workloads change. This cost-effective consumption model minimizes waste and reduces idle capacity.

Cloud-based systems often reserve fixed infrastructure and licensing, leading to higher costs over time. Additionally, manual scaling and slower update cycles compound operational expenses.

6. Security

Security in cloud-native applications is integrated directly into the software development lifecycle. Teams apply DevSecOps principles, ensuring continuous monitoring, automated patching, and real-time threat detection.

Cloud-based systems, however, often depend on periodic audits and manual configurations. Security measures typically focus on network perimeters, which can be insufficient for today’s distributed, API-driven environments.

7. Storage, data management, and portability

Cloud-native solutions use distributed data storage systems such as AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob. These services replicate data automatically and enable portability across providers.

Conversely, cloud-based applications may rely on older relational databases simply hosted in the cloud. These architectures can struggle to support real-time analytics or large-scale AI workloads.

Portability also distinguishes cloud-native designs: open-source frameworks and standardized APIs make it easier to migrate or integrate with different cloud providers, avoiding vendor lock-in.

8. Performance and automation

Cloud-native technologies continuously monitor performance metrics, adjusting workloads and redistributing cloud resources automatically. Developers gain visibility through observability tools, while orchestration ensures optimal usage.

Cloud-based systems rely on manual tuning or traditional monitoring scripts. Scaling decisions and updates often occur reactively, after bottlenecks appear.

9. Disaster recovery and business continuity

Cloud-native systems automate redundancy and failover through distributed replication across multiple regions and providers. Recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO) are minimized by design.

Cloud-based systems typically depend on backup snapshots and manual restore processes, which can be slow and risky.

To cut through the jargon, here’s a simplified overview of related concepts:

  • Cloud-enabled: On-prem software modified to operate in cloud environments but not redesigned for scalability.

  • Cloud-ready: Applications capable of being migrated but still reliant on internal systems.

  • Cloud-optimized: Systems tuned for a specific service provider, often using proprietary APIs.

  • Cloud-agnostic: Portable across multiple clouds using open-source or standardized frameworks.

  • Cloud-first: A strategy to prioritize cloud solutions for all new initiatives.

  • Cloud-hosted: Software delivered as SaaS by a third-party provider.

Each term has nuance, but the key distinction remains: cloud-native systems are built ground up for cloud infrastructure, while others are adapted in various degrees to benefit from cloud computing.

Why a cloud-native approach matters for data governance

Data governance and compliance have become core priorities as enterprises embrace multicloud and AI. A cloud-native approach ensures governance scales with your environment rather than hindering innovation.

  • Policy enforcement at the point of use: Integrated directly into data pipelines and workflows.

  • Federated visibility: Consistent governance across hybrid, on-premises infrastructure, and different cloud providers.

  • Automated lineage and monitoring: Metadata flows dynamically, simplifying audits and compliance.

  • Continuous improvement: Governance evolves alongside application development and software upgrades.

In other words, cloud-native governance scales with your data, not against it.

Image promoting Alation's whitepaper, the Data Governance Methodology

What are the benefits of a cloud-native data catalog?

A cloud-native data catalog consolidates data governance, discovery, and analytics into one scalable platform.

  • Unified view: Discover and manage data across AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud environments.

  • Elastic scalability: Expand instantly with on-demand provisioning of storage and compute.

  • AI readiness: Deliver trusted metadata to power machine learning and AI-driven insights.

  • Continuous compliance: Automate controls without slowing productivity.

  • Hybrid flexibility: Bridge cloud-native and cloud-based systems seamlessly.

This foundation ensures trusted data — essential for accurate analytics and responsible AI.

Alation’s cloud-native systems

Alation’s unified cloud-native data catalog enables enterprises to:

  • Discover and govern data across both cloud-native microservices and legacy, cloud-based architectures

  • Integrate with open-source and commercial tools across different cloud providers

  • Streamline operations and upgrades, reducing complexity while maintaining governance

  • Support AI and analytics through automated metadata enrichment

  • Maintain full lineage and auditability across hybrid environments

With Alation, organizations can harness the power of cloud-native technologies to unify visibility, governance, and collaboration — regardless of where data resides.

Cloud-native systems are the future

Industry forecasts are clear: 89% of organizations now use multiple cloud providers, and 73% leverage hybrid strategies (Flexera State of the Cloud 2024). As multicloud adoption grows, cloud-native networking and serverless computing will become standard practice.

Cloud-native applications — built on open-source technologies and orchestrated via microservices architecture — are the next evolution of application development. They empower enterprises to run applications flexibly across different cloud providers, deploy new features faster, and deliver greater business resilience.

Final thoughts

Cloud-native isn’t just a technology shift — it’s a mindset. It represents a commitment to agility, resilience, and continuous innovation.

By understanding the nine key differences between cloud-native and cloud-based systems, organizations can chart a path toward flexible architectures that harness the benefits of cloud computing while maintaining governance and control.

For enterprises navigating modernization, cloud-native solutions like Alation’s data catalog offer a unified, scalable, and intelligent foundation for success — built to adapt, evolve, and thrive in the AI-driven future.

    Contents
  • What is cloud-native?
  • What is cloud-based?
  • What is the difference between cloud-based and cloud-native?
  • How cloud-native and cloud-based differ from related cloud terms
  • Why a cloud-native approach matters for data governance
  • What are the benefits of a cloud-native data catalog?
  • Alation’s cloud-native systems
  • Cloud-native systems are the future

FAQs

Tagged with

Loading...